PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. PATH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. PATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -31.85% return.


MA

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-14.65%
6M
-9.84%
1Y
-17.21%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
18.40%

PATH

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.52%
YTD
-31.85%
6M
-42.09%
1Y
-15.44%
3Y*
-13.35%
5Y*
-30.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-14.65%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%-4.36%
PATH
UiPath Inc.
-31.85%28.95%-48.83%95.44%-70.53%-34.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and PATH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.33

The correlation between MA and PATH shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MA:

$433.70B

PATH:

$5.90B

EPS

MA:

$17.28

PATH:

$0.61

PE Ratio

MA:

28.11

PATH:

18.43

PS Ratio

MA:

12.90

PATH:

3.61

PB Ratio

MA:

64.52

PATH:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

MA:

$33.94B

PATH:

$1.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MA:

$26.70B

PATH:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

MA:

$21.23B

PATH:

$115.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PATH
PATH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAPATHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.01

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.30

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.68

-0.55

-1.13

MA vs. PATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the PATH Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and PATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAPATHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

-0.24

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.48

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.47

+1.30

Drawdowns

MA vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and PATH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPATHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-88.98%

+26.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-51.37%

+30.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-65.10%

+44.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-87.33%

+59.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-86.88%

+68.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-73.75%

+63.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

28.16%

-17.90%

Volatility

MA vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.33%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPATHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

19.80%

-13.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

43.04%

-25.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

63.65%

-41.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

63.64%

-39.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

64.24%

-37.31%

Dividends

MA vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
PATH
UiPath Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MA vs. PATH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
418.38M
(MA) Total Revenue
(PATH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MA vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mastercard Incorporated and UiPath Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
81.6%
Portfolio components
MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

PATH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

PATH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.

PATH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MA and PATH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PATH has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to MA (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs PATH's -88.98%.

PATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and PATH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer