PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. CAR-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MA is traded in USD, while CAR-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CAR-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.78% return, which is significantly lower than CAR-UN.TO's -4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed CAR-UN.TO with an annualized return of 18.76%, while CAR-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


MA

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
-13.78%
6M
-13.51%
1Y
-12.19%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
18.76%

CAR-UN.TO

1D
-0.97%
1M
4.70%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-3.65%
1Y
-21.50%
3Y*
-9.51%
5Y*
-9.24%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.78%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-4.13%-8.13%-16.89%20.76%-30.94%23.02%-0.61%28.21%13.02%32.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and CAR-UN.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

0.22

The correlation between MA and CAR-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MA:

$438.14B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$5.50B

EPS

MA:

$17.28

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$0.04

PE Ratio

MA:

28.40

CAR-UN.TO:

846.26

PEG Ratio

MA:

1.66

CAR-UN.TO:

1.65

PS Ratio

MA:

13.03

CAR-UN.TO:

5.61

PB Ratio

MA:

65.18

CAR-UN.TO:

0.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

MA:

$33.94B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$997.95M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MA:

$26.70B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$593.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

MA:

$21.23B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$282.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CAR-UN.TO
CAR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MACAR-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.83

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.78

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-1.24

+0.07

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is higher than the CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and CAR-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than CAR-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and CAR-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACAR-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-50.42%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-27.51%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-39.41%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-44.95%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-44.95%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.71%

-42.37%

+24.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-14.11%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

17.35%

-6.97%

Volatility

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) at 6.10%. This indicates that MA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAR-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACAR-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

6.10%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

14.18%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

18.70%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.02%

22.27%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

22.19%

+4.74%

Dividends

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than CAR-UN.TO's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
4.43%4.29%3.45%2.97%3.40%2.35%2.76%2.59%2.96%3.42%3.94%4.50%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.66%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%

Financials

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
247.90M
(MA) Total Revenue
(CAR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MA values in USD, CAR-UN.TO values in CAD

MA vs. CAR-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mastercard Incorporated and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.4%
56.9%
Portfolio components
MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

CAR-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 141.10M and revenue of 247.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

CAR-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 147.73M and revenue of 247.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.6%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.

CAR-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -182.45M and revenue of 247.90M, resulting in a net margin of -73.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MA and CAR-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and CAR-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer