PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-1.11%-10.17%-6.48%19.26%-26.56%22.96%-2.97%22.93%22.52%23.53%
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-30.38%-13.47%-5.92%-12.14%-38.62%20.95%-24.39%21.30%9.29%21.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$5.68B

AP-UN.TO:

CA$1.28B

EPS

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$1.24

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$9.50

PS Ratio

CAR-UN.TO:

5.72

AP-UN.TO:

2.16

PB Ratio

CAR-UN.TO:

0.65

AP-UN.TO:

0.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$1.00B

AP-UN.TO:

CA$592.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$593.74M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$313.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$480.34M

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$1.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAR-UN.TO achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly higher than AP-UN.TO's -30.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CAR-UN.TO has outperformed AP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 6.10%, while AP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -7.09% annualized return.


CAR-UN.TO

1D
1.61%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-1.11%
6M
-9.08%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
-3.99%
5Y*
-3.88%
10Y*
6.10%

AP-UN.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-30.38%
6M
-54.18%
1Y
-39.94%
3Y*
-19.86%
5Y*
-19.43%
10Y*
-7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAR-UN.TO
CAR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AP-UN.TO
AP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAR-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.92

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.78

-1.02

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.80

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.66

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

-1.31

+0.25

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is higher than the AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAR-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAR-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.92

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

-0.65

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

-0.26

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.24

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between CAR-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CAR-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than AP-UN.TO's 15.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
4.30%4.19%7.00%4.12%3.40%2.35%2.76%2.59%2.96%3.42%3.95%4.50%
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
15.74%12.79%10.50%11.30%6.84%3.88%4.38%3.07%3.53%3.65%4.18%4.65%

Drawdowns

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAR-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.08%, smaller than the maximum AP-UN.TO drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAR-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAR-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.08%

-76.72%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-58.74%

+37.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-73.59%

+38.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.20%

-76.72%

+38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.84%

-75.80%

+45.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-16.95%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.34%

29.45%

-17.11%

Volatility

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) is 4.49%, while Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that CAR-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAR-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

5.74%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

43.50%

-31.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

43.83%

-24.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

30.16%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

27.33%

-6.30%

Financials

CAR-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
243.30M
148.77M
(CAR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items