M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

M37R.DE (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) and XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - M37R.DE tracks the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse while XMOV.DE tracks the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, M37R.DE returned -5.22% vs 51.46% for XMOV.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. M37R.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMOV.DE.

Performance

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, M37R.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than XMOV.DE's 27.31% return.

M37R.DE

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: -6.38%
• 6M: -12.87%
• 1Y: -5.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMOV.DE

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 25.74%
• 1Y: 51.46%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 13.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF	-6.38%	-10.17%	28.74%
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF	27.31%	14.79%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between M37R.DE and XMOV.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	0.64

The correlation between M37R.DE and XMOV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

M37R.DE

M37R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
M37R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
M37R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
M37R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
M37R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
M37R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XMOV.DE

XMOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XMOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XMOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XMOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XMOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	M37R.DE	XMOV.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	2.57	-2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	3.41	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.45	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	4.71	-4.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	17.12	-17.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current M37R.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of M37R.DE and XMOV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	M37R.DE	XMOV.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18	2.57	-2.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.76	-0.61

Drawdowns

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum M37R.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than XMOV.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M37R.DE and XMOV.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	M37R.DE	XMOV.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.85%	-34.78%	-4.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.85%	-10.87%	-27.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.62%	-2.17%	-22.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.24%	-7.53%	-6.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.99%	3.00%	+15.99%

Volatility

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) at 8.84%. This indicates that M37R.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMOV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	M37R.DE	XMOV.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.35%	8.84%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.98%	15.94%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.65%	19.94%	+8.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.04%	19.34%	+12.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.04%	20.77%	+11.27%

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

M37R.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XMOV.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

M37R.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither M37R.DE nor XMOV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both M37R.DE and XMOV.DE in my portfolio?

M37R.DE and XMOV.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, M37R.DE or XMOV.DE?

On fees, XMOV.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, M37R.DE or XMOV.DE?

XMOV.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M37R.DE.

What is the main difference between M37R.DE and XMOV.DE?

M37R.DE tracks Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse, while XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for M37R.DE and 0.35% for XMOV.DE.