M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE).
M37R.DE and RM8U.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. M37R.DE is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022. RM8U.DE is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Feb 12, 2020. Both M37R.DE and RM8U.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -20.04% | -10.17% | 28.74% |
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 9.92% | 48.89% | 4.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M37R.DE achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than RM8U.DE's 9.92% return.
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -20.04%
- 6M
- -31.63%
- 1Y
- -8.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RM8U.DE
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 41.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 22.59%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M37R.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M37R.DE
RM8U.DE
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| M37R.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 1.76 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 2.25 | -2.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 2.57 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 9.74 | -10.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| M37R.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 1.76 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 1.12 | -1.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between M37R.DE and RM8U.DE is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither M37R.DE nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M37R.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than RM8U.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M37R.DE and RM8U.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| M37R.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -18.51% | -20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.85% | -16.54% | -22.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.62% | -9.03% | -26.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -5.96% | -6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 4.37% | +10.68% |
Volatility
M37R.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) is 10.31%, while HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that M37R.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RM8U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| M37R.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 11.24% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.55% | 20.98% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 23.69% | +9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 15.77% | +16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 16.11% | +16.00% |