XMOV.DE vs. SILJ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMOV.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMOV.DE returned 13.99%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMOV.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XMOV.DE is traded in EUR, while SILJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SILJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMOV.DE achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's 8.27% return.

XMOV.DE

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 25.74%
• 1Y: 51.46%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 13.99%
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 105.62%
• 3Y*: 43.99%
• 5Y*: 14.27%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF	27.31%	14.79%	20.92%	46.97%	-25.82%	22.52%	13.89%	9.99%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	8.27%	150.20%	13.42%	-8.05%	-10.18%	-17.46%	22.04%	40.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XMOV.DE and SILJ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019	0.16

The correlation between XMOV.DE and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMOV.DE

XMOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XMOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XMOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XMOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XMOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 55
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMOV.DE	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.00	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.33	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.32	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	3.17	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.12	7.79	+9.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMOV.DE and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMOV.DE	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.00	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.34	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.11	+0.65

Drawdowns

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMOV.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -74.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMOV.DE and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMOV.DE	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.78%	-74.59%	+39.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-33.46%	+22.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.70%	-33.46%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.32%	-49.98%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-69.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-25.37%	+23.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-38.41%	+30.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	13.60%	-10.60%

Volatility

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) is 8.84%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that XMOV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMOV.DE	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.84%	17.79%	-8.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.94%	43.46%	-27.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	53.12%	-33.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	41.84%	-22.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.77%	44.16%	-23.39%

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMOV.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMOV.DE vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

XMOV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	1.87%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMOV.DE and SILJ in my portfolio?

XMOV.DE and SILJ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMOV.DE or SILJ?

On fees, XMOV.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMOV.DE or SILJ?

XMOV.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

What is the main difference between XMOV.DE and SILJ?

XMOV.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while SILJ is Silver. XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMOV.DE and 0.69% for SILJ.