PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
M37R.DE
HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF
-20.04%-10.17%1.22%
AIAA.DE
iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-8.24%5.44%-1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, M37R.DE achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than AIAA.DE's -8.24% return.


M37R.DE

1D
3.87%
1M
-9.89%
YTD
-20.04%
6M
-31.63%
1Y
-8.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIAA.DE

1D
2.03%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-3.71%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

M37R.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AIAA.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

M37R.DE
M37R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
M37R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M37R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
M37R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
M37R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
M37R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AIAA.DE
AIAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


M37R.DEAIAA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

0.05

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.15

0.19

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.03

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.07

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.62

0.23

-0.85

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current M37R.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of M37R.DE and AIAA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


M37R.DEAIAA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

0.05

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

-0.21

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between M37R.DE and AIAA.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither M37R.DE nor AIAA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum M37R.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than AIAA.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M37R.DE and AIAA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


M37R.DEAIAA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-24.42%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.85%

-14.39%

-24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.62%

-10.89%

-24.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-7.32%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

4.02%

+11.03%

Volatility

M37R.DE vs. AIAA.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) at 4.97%. This indicates that M37R.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIAA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


M37R.DEAIAA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

4.97%

+5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

9.90%

+11.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.81%

18.06%

+14.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.11%

17.77%

+14.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.11%

17.77%

+14.34%