M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE).
M37R.DE and CSTA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. M37R.DE is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. It was launched on Mar 15, 2022. CSTA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Technology. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. Both M37R.DE and CSTA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -20.04% | -10.17% | 28.74% |
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | -2.16% | 3.46% | -2.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M37R.DE achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than CSTA.DE's -2.16% return.
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -20.04%
- 6M
- -31.63%
- 1Y
- -8.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSTA.DE
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.74%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M37R.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M37R.DE
CSTA.DE
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| M37R.DE | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 0.10 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 0.31 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.04 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 0.17 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 0.46 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| M37R.DE | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.10 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.46 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between M37R.DE and CSTA.DE is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither M37R.DE nor CSTA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSTA.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.26% | 1.49% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M37R.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, roughly equal to the maximum CSTA.DE drawdown of -40.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M37R.DE and CSTA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| M37R.DE | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.85% | -40.24% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.85% | -14.91% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.62% | -10.99% | -24.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -8.82% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 5.58% | +9.47% |
Volatility
M37R.DE vs. CSTA.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Technology UCITS ETF Dist (CSTA.DE) at 8.25%. This indicates that M37R.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| M37R.DE | CSTA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 8.25% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.55% | 16.85% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 23.77% | +9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 24.72% | +7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 23.12% | +8.99% |