PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and LCUS.DE (Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Amundi - LYYB.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select while LCUS.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYYB.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUS.DE.

Performance

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

LYYB.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.39%
6M
9.65%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
14.30%

LCUS.DE

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LYYB.DE
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist		10.39%2.83%31.27%22.21%-17.02%38.79%9.55%34.69%-0.74%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%9.09%34.14%-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LYYB.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.89

The correlation between LYYB.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist

Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Often compared with LYYB.DE:
LYYB.DE vs. F500.DELYYB.DE vs. UC99.LLYYB.DE vs. VUSA.LLYYB.DE vs. GXLK.LLYYB.DE vs. MIVU.DELYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DELYYB.DE vs. IITU.L
Often compared with LCUS.DE:
LCUS.DE vs. WEBLLCUS.DE vs. QDVE.DELCUS.DE vs. SCHGLCUS.DE vs. SLUS.DELCUS.DE vs. JGPI.DELCUS.DE vs. DELG.DELCUS.DE vs. V3YA.DE

Return for Risk

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LYYB.DE
LYYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LYYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LYYB.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.64

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LYYB.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

—

—

Drawdowns

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LYYB.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.38%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.11%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

—

—

Volatility

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LYYB.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

—

—

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYYB.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LYYB.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while LCUS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist		0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYYB.DE
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist		0.81%0.99%0.78%0.00%1.12%0.95%1.31%1.14%1.81%1.64%1.88%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

LYYB.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LYYB.DE.

LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYYB.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYYB.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer