LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LYYB.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYYB.DE returned 14.30%/yr vs 21.42%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYYB.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYYB.DE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LYYB.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 14.30%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.
LYYB.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 10.39% | 2.83% | 31.27% | 22.21% | -17.02% | 38.79% | 9.55% | 34.69% | -1.22% | 6.95% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 20.65% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 42.90% | 3.22% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYYB.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between LYYB.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYYB.DE
6AQQ.DE
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYYB.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.77 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 11.17 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYYB.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.41 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.94 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 1.08 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.08 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYYB.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.38%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYYB.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYYB.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.38% | -31.19% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -10.01% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | -26.73% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -31.19% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -31.19% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.84% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -5.36% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.39% | -0.94% |
Volatility
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) is 2.66%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that LYYB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYYB.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 4.40% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 10.96% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 15.66% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 19.83% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.63% | -3.32% |
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYYB.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYYB.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.95% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.88% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LYYB.DE and 6AQQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
LYYB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYYB.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYYB.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer