LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L
LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LYYB.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select while UC99.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYYB.DE returned 14.30%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for UC99.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYYB.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYYB.DE is traded in EUR, while UC99.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC99.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYYB.DE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 11.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LYYB.DE has underperformed UC99.L with an annualized return of 14.30%, while UC99.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.
LYYB.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
UC99.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 10.39% | 2.83% | 31.27% | 22.21% | -17.02% | 38.79% | 9.55% | 34.69% | -1.22% | 6.95% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 11.42% | 3.02% | 28.51% | 30.28% | -19.41% | 37.00% | 10.10% | 40.98% | -0.74% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYYB.DE and UC99.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between LYYB.DE and UC99.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYYB.DE
UC99.L
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYYB.DE | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.71 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 9.59 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYYB.DE | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.01 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.89 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.86 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYYB.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.38%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -29.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYYB.DE and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYYB.DE | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.38% | -29.76% | -23.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -9.60% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | -24.39% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -24.39% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -29.76% | -4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -5.22% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 2.71% | -0.26% |
Volatility
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) is 2.66%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that LYYB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYYB.DE | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.88% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 8.97% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 12.90% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 16.83% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 17.04% | -0.73% |
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYYB.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYYB.DE vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.95% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.88% | 2.03% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYYB.DE and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYYB.DE and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for LYYB.DE and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer