LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L
LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) and VUSA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LYYB.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while VUSA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYYB.DE returned 14.30%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for VUSA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYYB.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUSA.L.
Performance
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYYB.DE is traded in EUR, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYYB.DE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than VUSA.L's 11.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LYYB.DE having a 14.30% annualized return and VUSA.L not far ahead at 14.97%.
LYYB.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
VUSA.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 10.39% | 2.83% | 31.27% | 22.21% | -17.02% | 38.79% | 9.55% | 34.69% | -1.22% | 6.95% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 11.52% | 3.69% | 33.47% | 22.35% | -13.71% | 39.50% | 7.48% | 34.59% | -1.35% | 6.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYYB.DE and VUSA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LYYB.DE and VUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYYB.DE
VUSA.L
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYYB.DE | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.59 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 13.05 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYYB.DE | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.27 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.98 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.92 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.96 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYYB.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.38%, which is greater than VUSA.L's maximum drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYYB.DE and VUSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYYB.DE | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.38% | -32.91% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -7.13% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.11% | -22.25% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | -22.25% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -32.91% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.40% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -4.00% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 1.97% | +0.48% |
Volatility
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 2.17%. This indicates that LYYB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYYB.DE | VUSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.17% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 7.39% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 11.26% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 15.05% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 16.17% | +0.14% |
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYYB.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LYYB.DE vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison
LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VUSA.L's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.95% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.88% | 2.03% |
VUSA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.44% | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LYYB.DE and VUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LYYB.DE.
LYYB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LYYB.DE and 0.07% for VUSA.L.
Find the right allocation for LYYB.DE and VUSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer