LCUS.DE vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LCUS.DE (Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUS.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.

Performance

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LCUS.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

LCUS.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 22.19%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	3.40%	32.87%	22.96%	-15.87%	37.82%	9.09%	34.14%	-0.91%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	8.00%	3.56%	43.86%	45.60%	-27.58%	37.70%	27.67%	39.09%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUS.DE and SCHG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018	0.49

The correlation between LCUS.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCUS.DE	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.91	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUS.DE	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.88%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.46%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCUS.DE	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.84%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.97%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.86%	—

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LCUS.DE and SCHG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCUS.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

LCUS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.84%	0.78%	2.27%	1.12%	1.52%	1.10%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUS.DE and SCHG in my portfolio?

LCUS.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUS.DE or SCHG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUS.DE or SCHG?

LCUS.DE and SCHG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

What is the main difference between LCUS.DE and SCHG?

LCUS.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Charles Schwab.