SANM vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SANM or SQM.
Key characteristics
SANM | SQM | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 57.19% | -38.22% |
1Y Return | 69.39% | -21.88% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 26.37% | -12.08% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 20.31% | 15.02% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 12.42% | 8.90% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.59 | -0.41 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.69 | -0.32 |
Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Martin Ratio | 10.26 | -0.68 |
Ulcer Index | 6.75% | 28.96% |
Daily Std Dev | 43.44% | 48.22% |
Max Drawdown | -99.66% | -77.80% |
Current Drawdown | -77.19% | -62.62% |
Fundamentals
SANM | SQM | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $4.41B | $10.33B |
EPS | $3.91 | $0.09 |
PE Ratio | 20.65 | 411.44 |
PEG Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.57B | $3.69B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $640.43M | $1.15B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $436.04M | $1.23B |
Correlation
The correlation between SANM and SQM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SANM vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a 57.19% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -38.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SANM has outperformed SQM with an annualized return of 12.42%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SANM vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SANM vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sanmina Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.93% | 8.51% | 9.79% | 3.90% | 1.65% | 4.59% | 5.41% | 2.39% | 5.31% | 2.41% | 5.83% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
SANM vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SANM vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 12.20%. This indicates that SANM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SANM vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities