SANM vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SANM or SQM.
Correlation
The correlation between SANM and SQM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SANM vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SANM:
36.82%
SQM:
22.11%
SANM:
-99.66%
SQM:
-0.86%
SANM:
-77.42%
SQM:
0.00%
Fundamentals
SANM:
$4.27B
SQM:
$9.79B
SANM:
$4.32
SQM:
-$1.42
SANM:
0.91
SQM:
0.69
SANM:
0.54
SQM:
2.09
SANM:
1.93
SQM:
1.93
SANM:
$7.85B
SQM:
$4.52B
SANM:
$668.98M
SQM:
$1.25B
SANM:
$482.12M
SQM:
$1.15B
Returns By Period
SANM
5.66%
5.27%
-3.99%
23.13%
24.75%
13.88%
SQM
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SANM vs. SQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SANM
SQM
SANM vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SANM vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
Neither SANM nor SQM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SANM vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -0.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
SANM vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
SANM vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SANM vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
SANM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 176.24M and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 293.76M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
SANM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 91.62M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 210.47M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
SANM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 64.21M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 120.13M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.