SANM vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Performance
SANM vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SANM vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SANM Sanmina Corporation | -13.61% | 98.32% | 47.30% | -10.33% | 38.18% | 30.01% | -6.86% | 42.31% | -27.09% | -9.96% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 17.65% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
Fundamentals
SANM:
$7.20B
SQM:
$23.12B
SANM:
$4.20
SQM:
$2.06
SANM:
30.88
SQM:
39.20
SANM:
6.75
SQM:
0.23
SANM:
0.76
SQM:
5.04
SANM:
0.99
SQM:
4.06
SANM:
$9.31B
SQM:
$4.59B
SANM:
$790.80M
SQM:
$1.36B
SANM:
$429.31M
SQM:
$1.27B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a -13.61% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 17.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SANM having a 18.71% annualized return and SQM not far ahead at 19.45%.
SANM
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -16.50%
- YTD
- -13.61%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 70.18%
- 3Y*
- 28.58%
- 5Y*
- 25.20%
- 10Y*
- 18.71%
SQM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 88.65%
- 1Y
- 104.09%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SANM vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
SANM
SQM
SANM vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SANM | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 2.04 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.61 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 4.06 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 9.94 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SANM | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.04 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between SANM and SQM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SANM vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SANM Sanmina Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
SANM vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and SQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SANM | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.66% | -78.34% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.69% | -25.02% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.92% | -69.76% | +35.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.85% | -72.98% | +17.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.38% | -18.36% | -45.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -30.43% | -41.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.10% | 10.22% | +1.88% |
Volatility
SANM vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) have volatilities of 17.43% and 17.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SANM | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.43% | 17.99% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.34% | 36.57% | +17.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.71% | 51.41% | +13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.63% | 49.55% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.19% | 45.99% | -4.80% |
Financials
SANM vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SANM vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
SANM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 242.36M and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 455.49M and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.
SANM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 73.60M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 398.13M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
SANM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 49.29M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 185.41M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.