LYSDY vs. TMRC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) and TMRC (Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY returned 73.51%/yr vs 21.43%/yr for TMRC. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LYSDY having a 48.37% return and TMRC slightly higher at 50.30%. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed TMRC with an annualized return of 73.51%, while TMRC has yielded a comparatively lower 21.43% annualized return.

LYSDY

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -13.02%
• YTD: 48.37%
• 6M: 35.43%
• 1Y: 108.67%
• 3Y*: 33.39%
• 5Y*: 23.91%
• 10Y*: 73.51%

TMRC

• 1D: 3.14%
• 1M: -16.36%
• YTD: 50.30%
• 6M: -2.70%
• 1Y: 57.63%
• 3Y*: -1.06%
• 5Y*: -16.53%
• 10Y*: 21.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	48.37%	109.37%	-18.22%	-8.17%	-29.21%	144.41%	79.88%	50.87%	489.58%	258.76%
TMRC Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp	50.30%	144.74%	-41.84%	-67.01%	-33.83%	11.30%	43.90%	397.98%	17.62%	91.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and TMRC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.06

Over the past year, LYSDY and TMRC have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LYSDY : $12.06B TMRC : $75.23M
EPS LYSDY : $0.14 TMRC : -$0.03
PB Ratio LYSDY : 3.59 TMRC : 17.63
Total Revenue (TTM) LYSDY : $1.19B TMRC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) LYSDY : $301.27M TMRC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) LYSDY : $236.57M TMRC : -$1.31M

Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. TMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 79
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

TMRC

TMRC Risk / Return Rank: 63
TMRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TMRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TMRC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TMRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TMRC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYSDY	TMRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.37	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.89	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	0.75	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	1.05	+3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the TMRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and TMRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYSDY	TMRC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	0.37	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.15	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.20	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.16	-0.13

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TMRC drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and TMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYSDY	TMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-95.42%	-4.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.39%	-77.33%	+30.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.39%	-83.33%	+36.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.25%	-91.57%	+33.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.35%	-95.42%	+23.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.62%	-79.96%	+24.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.52%	-53.93%	-30.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.07%	54.92%	-32.85%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 15.68%, while Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a volatility of 32.37%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYSDY	TMRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.68%	32.37%	-16.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.52%	88.53%	-45.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.31%	158.39%	-93.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.59%	109.32%	-58.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	278.65%	109.64%	+169.01%

Dividends

LYSDY vs. TMRC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYSDY nor TMRC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYSDY and TMRC in my portfolio?

LYSDY and TMRC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LYSDY or TMRC?

TMRC has higher volatility (32.37%) compared to LYSDY (15.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSDY dropped -99.93% vs TMRC's -95.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.