LYSDY vs. APXCF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) and APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, LYSDY returned 108.67% vs 87.59% for APXCF. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 48.37% return, which is significantly higher than APXCF's -31.25% return.

LYSDY

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -13.02%
• YTD: 48.37%
• 6M: 35.43%
• 1Y: 108.67%
• 3Y*: 33.39%
• 5Y*: 23.91%
• 10Y*: 73.51%

APXCF

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: -29.94%
• YTD: -31.25%
• 6M: -29.49%
• 1Y: 87.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	48.37%	109.37%	-7.93%
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp	-31.25%	213.05%	26.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and APXCF is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024	0.06

Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. APXCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 79
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

APXCF

APXCF Risk / Return Rank: 69
APXCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
APXCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
APXCF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
APXCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
APXCF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYSDY	APXCF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.77	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.86	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.22	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.28	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	2.13	+2.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the APXCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and APXCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYSDY	APXCF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	0.77	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.54	-0.52

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than APXCF's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and APXCF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYSDY	APXCF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.93%	-68.58%	-31.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.39%	-68.58%	+22.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.62%	-68.58%	+12.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.52%	-30.86%	-53.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.07%	41.24%	-19.17%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 15.68%, while Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) has a volatility of 23.16%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APXCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYSDY	APXCF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.68%	23.16%	-7.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.52%	62.19%	-18.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.31%	114.66%	-49.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.59%	128.20%	-77.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	278.65%	128.20%	+150.45%

Dividends

LYSDY vs. APXCF - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYSDY nor APXCF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYSDY and APXCF in my portfolio?

LYSDY and APXCF have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LYSDY or APXCF?

APXCF has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to LYSDY (15.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSDY dropped -99.93% vs APXCF's -68.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.