PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AP vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


APETN
YTD Return-32.60%19.77%
1Y Return-41.59%25.03%
3Y Return (Ann)-26.54%21.97%
5Y Return (Ann)-12.78%30.88%
10Y Return (Ann)-20.71%18.61%
Sharpe Ratio-0.460.92
Daily Std Dev91.05%28.49%
Max Drawdown-98.06%-68.95%
Current Drawdown-95.24%-15.90%

Fundamentals


APETN
Market Cap$36.97M$114.96B
EPS-$2.14$9.09
PEG Ratio0.002.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$431.53M$24.14B
Gross Profit (TTM)$61.30M$9.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$25.40M$4.90B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between AP and ETN is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AP vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AP achieves a -32.60% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 19.77% return. Over the past 10 years, AP has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -20.71%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-29.21%
-4.21%
AP
ETN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation

Eaton Corporation plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AP vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AP, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AP, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AP, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AP, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AP, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00-1.13
ETN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ETN, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ETN, currently valued at 3.46, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.003.46

AP vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AP Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AP and ETN.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.46
0.92
AP
ETN

Dividends

AP vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

AP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AP
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.45%2.69%7.02%3.74%3.70%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.29%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%

Drawdowns

AP vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AP drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-95.24%
-15.90%
AP
ETN

Volatility

AP vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a higher volatility of 26.85% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 8.94%. This indicates that AP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
26.85%
8.94%
AP
ETN

Financials

AP vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items