AP vs. ETN
Compare and contrast key facts about Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AP or ETN.
Correlation
The correlation between AP and ETN is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AP vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AP:
0.26
ETN:
-0.15
AP:
1.26
ETN:
0.08
AP:
1.14
ETN:
1.01
AP:
0.22
ETN:
-0.14
AP:
0.88
ETN:
-0.35
AP:
24.63%
ETN:
14.02%
AP:
101.23%
ETN:
38.27%
AP:
-98.06%
ETN:
-68.95%
AP:
-93.58%
ETN:
-18.09%
Fundamentals
AP:
$44.81M
ETN:
$117.42B
AP:
$0.02
ETN:
$9.50
AP:
111.50
ETN:
31.55
AP:
0.00
ETN:
2.51
AP:
0.11
ETN:
4.62
AP:
0.73
ETN:
6.35
AP:
$308.09M
ETN:
$25.31B
AP:
$58.80M
ETN:
$9.73B
AP:
$29.60M
ETN:
$5.80B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AP achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's -6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AP has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -16.58%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.
AP
18.66%
36.26%
29.17%
26.53%
-4.07%
-16.58%
ETN
-6.82%
22.51%
-14.23%
-5.83%
32.95%
18.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AP vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AP
ETN
AP vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AP vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
AP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 2.69% | 7.02% | 3.74% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 2.43% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
AP vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AP drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AP vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a higher volatility of 23.47% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 15.23%. This indicates that AP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AP vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AP vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
AP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.69M and revenue of 100.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.
AP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 5.17M and revenue of 100.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
AP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of 3.10M and revenue of 100.94M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.