LX vs. NUKZ
LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, LX returned -68.23% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LX vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LX achieves a -31.09% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 7.72% return.
LX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -31.09%
- 6M
- -31.51%
- 1Y
- -68.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- -25.63%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LX vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -31.09% | -40.97% | 204.54% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.72% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LX and NUKZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LX vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
LX
NUKZ
LX vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 1.92 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 4.79 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | 1.05 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 1.63 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
LX vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LX and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -33.03% | -60.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.18% | -16.51% | -55.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.24% | -10.27% | -74.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.32% | -6.02% | -57.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.57% | 6.62% | +42.95% |
Volatility
LX vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.20%. This indicates that LX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 10.20% | +12.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 22.61% | +13.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.97% | 30.26% | +33.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.71% | 32.82% | +40.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 323.46% | 32.82% | +290.64% |
Dividends
LX vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
LX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.45%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 18.45% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LX and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to NUKZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LX dropped -93.19% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LX and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer