LVLN vs. XLK
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
LVLN vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 25.39% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -6.66%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 25.39%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- 1Y
- 53.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- 24.71%
LVLN vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 0.80% | 1.20% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.39% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and XLK is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
XLK
LVLN vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVLN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.40 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -82.05% | +79.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -9.04% | +8.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -34.95% | +34.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 21.96% | -19.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 25.07% | -22.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 24.59% | -21.81% |
LVLN vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than XLK's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and XLK have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVLN.
LVLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.
LVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while XLK is Technology Equities. LVLN tracks S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer