LVLN vs. LONZ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and LONZ (PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. LVLN is passively managed, while LONZ is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for LONZ.

Performance

LVLN vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than LONZ's 1.44% return.

LVLN

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LONZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVLN vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF	0.80%	1.20%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.44%	0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LVLN and LONZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

LVLN vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONZ

LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 72
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVLN vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVLN	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	2.31	-0.95

Drawdowns

LVLN vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum LONZ drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and LONZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVLN	LONZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-4.19%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.39%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-0.47%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LVLN	LONZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78%	2.27%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.78%	3.21%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.78%	3.21%	-0.43%

LVLN vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVLN vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than LONZ's 8.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	8.16%	6.60%	8.16%	8.29%	3.33%
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF	3.72%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVLN and LONZ in my portfolio?

LVLN and LONZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LVLN or LONZ?

On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LVLN or LONZ?

LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for LONZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LVLN or LONZ?

LONZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.16%, compared with 3.72% for LVLN.

What is the main difference between LVLN and LONZ?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.62% for LONZ.