LONZ vs. FLRT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT).
LONZ and FLRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LONZ is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LONZ or FLRT.
Key characteristics
| LONZ | FLRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.45% | 6.67% |
| 1Y Return | 9.86% | 10.49% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.64 | 6.86 |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.14% | 1.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.05% | -20.96% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LONZ and FLRT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LONZ vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LONZ having a 6.45% return and FLRT slightly higher at 6.67%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LONZ vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LONZ has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LONZ vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LONZ vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
LONZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, less than FLRT's 8.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 7.59% | 8.29% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 8.30% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
LONZ vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LONZ drawdown since its inception was -4.05%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONZ and FLRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LONZ vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.50%. This indicates that LONZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.