LVHI vs. ULVM
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 16.77%/yr vs 12.55%/yr for ULVM. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
LVHI vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 20.05% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 15.22%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.17M | $30.23M | $26.64M | |
| $297.74K | $260.49K | $217.66K |
LVHI vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 18.29% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 2.01% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 20.05% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and ULVM is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between LVHI and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
ULVM
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
ULVM
Energy
LVHI
ULVM
Industrials
LVHI
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
ULVM
Utilities
LVHI
ULVM
Healthcare
LVHI
ULVM
Basic Materials
LVHI
ULVM
Communication Services
LVHI
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
ULVM
Real Estate
LVHI
ULVM
Technology
LVHI
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
ULVM
LVHI vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.49 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 4.63 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.05 | 19.50 | +4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -40.71% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -6.47% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -18.14% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -19.77% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -1.26% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -5.65% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 1.53% | -0.08% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.48%, while VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 2.72% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 8.10% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.46% | 10.81% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 15.39% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 18.73% | -5.03% |
LVHI vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than ULVM's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.51% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.62% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and ULVM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULVM has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to LVHI (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 16.77% vs 12.55% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 16.77% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.62% for ULVM.
LVHI is categorized as Dividend, while ULVM is Momentum. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.20% for ULVM.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer