LVHI vs. QYLD
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.66%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
LVHI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 8.36% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
LVHI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.06% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 8.36% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and QYLD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between LVHI and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
QYLD
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
QYLD
Energy
LVHI
QYLD
Industrials
LVHI
QYLD
Utilities
LVHI
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
QYLD
Healthcare
LVHI
QYLD
Basic Materials
LVHI
QYLD
Communication Services
LVHI
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
QYLD
Real Estate
LVHI
QYLD
Technology
LVHI
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
QYLD
LVHI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.58 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 4.81 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.39 | 27.11 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -24.75% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -4.97% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -19.06% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -24.61% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -3.83% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 0.88% | +0.59% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.83%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.87% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 7.86% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 9.19% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 14.77% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 15.53% | -1.78% |
LVHI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than QYLD's 11.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.72% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.41% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to LVHI (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 8.41% for QYLD. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 4.72% for LVHI.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.60% for QYLD.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer