LVHI vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. LVHI is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, LVHI returned 32.13% vs 47.83% for GSIB. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

LVHI vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LVHI having a 13.78% return and GSIB slightly higher at 13.98%.

LVHI

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 6M: 14.96%
• 1Y: 32.13%
• 3Y*: 21.52%
• 5Y*: 15.97%
• 10Y*: —

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	13.78%	27.12%	14.81%	0.51%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and GSIB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.65

The correlation between LVHI and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LVHI	GSIB
Financial Services	23.6%	100.0%
Energy	17.4%	-
Industrials	13.4%	-
Utilities	10.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	-
Healthcare	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.1%	-
Communication Services	5.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Technology	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

LVHI vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI

LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 94
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 93

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LVHI	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.31	2.59	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	3.58	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.43	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	3.28	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.61	11.54	+10.07

LVHI vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVHI	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-17.71%	-14.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.08%	-13.90%	+7.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-2.05%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.48%	3.94%	-2.46%

Volatility

LVHI vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LVHI	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	5.59%	-2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	14.41%	-6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.60%	17.63%	-8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.08%	18.51%	-7.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	18.51%	-4.76%

LVHI vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVHI vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	4.69%	4.92%	3.98%	8.12%	7.74%	4.13%	3.97%	6.67%	10.67%	3.38%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVHI and GSIB in my portfolio?

LVHI and GSIB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LVHI or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, LVHI or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 32.13% for LVHI. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LVHI or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 32.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LVHI or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LVHI or GSIB?

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between LVHI and GSIB?

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.