LVDS vs. IGF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).

LVDS and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LVDS is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007.

Performance

LVDS vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LVDS vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	1.98%	7.24%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	9.19%	5.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.19% return.

LVDS

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVDS vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

LVDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF

Return for Risk

LVDS vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 93
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVDS vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVDS	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	0.24	+1.06

Correlation

The correlation between LVDS and IGF is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LVDS vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than IGF's 2.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	8.42%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.95%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Drawdowns

LVDS vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVDS	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-58.33%	+51.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-3.42%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-11.96%	+10.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LVDS	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	12.73%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.29%	13.89%	-3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.29%	16.81%	-6.52%