LVDS vs. ILCV
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LVDS is actively managed, while ILCV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCV.
Performance
LVDS vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.60% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
LVDS vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 15.18% | 7.40% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 7.60% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and ILCV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.89 |
LVDS vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVDS
ILCV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
LVDS
ILCV
Technology
LVDS
ILCV
Industrials
LVDS
ILCV
Healthcare
LVDS
ILCV
Consumer Cyclical
LVDS
ILCV
Communication Services
LVDS
ILCV
Energy
LVDS
ILCV
Consumer Defensive
LVDS
ILCV
Utilities
LVDS
ILCV
Real Estate
LVDS
ILCV
Basic Materials
LVDS
ILCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank
LVDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCV
LVDS vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVDS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and ILCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -58.63% | +51.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.39% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -9.30% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
LVDS vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 10.01% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.68% | 14.21% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.68% | 16.66% | -5.98% |
LVDS vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, more than ILCV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.45% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVDS and ILCV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 1.62% for ILCV.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.04% for ILCV.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and ILCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer