LVAFX vs. GCCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX).
LVAFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 24, 2014. GCCHX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Apr 4, 2017.
Performance
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 4.47% | 22.33% | 16.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 13.09% |
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund | 10.71% | 39.25% | -25.63% | -6.85% | -10.39% | 21.84% | 42.82% | 27.36% | -16.35% | 26.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 10.71% return.
LVAFX
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
GCCHX
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 69.04%
- 3Y*
- 0.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LVAFX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAFX
GCCHX
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVAFX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.55 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 3.20 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 4.57 | -2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 16.21 | -6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVAFX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.55 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.05 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.37 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAFX and GCCHX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison
LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than GCCHX's 1.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.74% | 10.17% | 18.36% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
GCCHX GMO Climate Change Fund | 1.36% | 1.51% | 0.66% | 0.96% | 2.24% | 25.43% | 5.42% | 4.03% | 2.62% | 3.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and GCCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAFX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -54.32% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -14.89% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -54.32% | +35.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -9.81% | +5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -14.11% | +9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 4.20% | -2.27% |
Volatility
LVAFX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) is 3.42%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that LVAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LVAFX | GCCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 9.28% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 17.44% | -11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 27.93% | -16.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 26.92% | -14.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 25.23% | -11.90% |