PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUV vs. PYPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUV vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -28.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has underperformed PYPL with an annualized return of 0.82%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.04% annualized return.


LUV

1D
0.56%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.94%
6M
10.70%
1Y
30.56%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
-5.20%
10Y*
0.82%

PYPL

1D
-3.42%
1M
-10.47%
YTD
-28.83%
6M
-33.28%
1Y
-42.53%
3Y*
-13.80%
5Y*
-30.83%
10Y*
1.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUV vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
0.94%25.62%19.11%-11.82%-21.41%-8.09%-13.32%17.72%-28.21%32.40%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
-28.83%-31.44%38.98%-13.77%-62.23%-19.48%116.51%28.64%14.22%86.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LUV and PYPL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2015

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUV:

$20.89B

PYPL:

$37.99B

EPS

LUV:

$1.56

PYPL:

$5.31

PE Ratio

LUV:

26.58

PYPL:

7.78

PS Ratio

LUV:

0.75

PYPL:

1.17

PB Ratio

LUV:

3.04

PYPL:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUV:

$28.88B

PYPL:

$33.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUV:

$6.36B

PYPL:

$15.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUV:

$2.74B

PYPL:

$7.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUV vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUV
LUV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PYPL
PYPL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PYPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUV vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUVPYPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.80

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

-0.85

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

-1.53

+3.38

LUV vs. PYPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUV Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the PYPL Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUV and PYPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUVPYPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-1.09

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.73

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.03

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.01

+0.33

Drawdowns

LUV vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and PYPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUVPYPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.25%

-87.30%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.49%

-49.92%

+16.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.93%

-57.34%

+14.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.44%

-87.30%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.76%

-87.30%

+22.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.42%

-86.50%

+56.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-35.67%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.58%

27.83%

-11.25%

Volatility

LUV vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 6.73%. This indicates that LUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUVPYPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

6.73%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.42%

31.71%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.33%

39.10%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.18%

42.08%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.63%

38.77%

-1.14%

Dividends

LUV vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison

LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than PYPL's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
1.73%1.74%2.14%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.30%1.30%0.73%0.75%0.66%
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
1.02%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LUV vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southwest Airlines Co. and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
7.25B
8.35B
(LUV) Total Revenue
(PYPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUV vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Southwest Airlines Co. and PayPal Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
32.2%
45.6%
Portfolio components
LUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 7.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

PYPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

LUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

PYPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

LUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a net income of 227.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

PYPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUV and PYPL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUV has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to PYPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUV dropped -78.25% vs PYPL's -87.30%.

LUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUV and PYPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer