PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUV vs. NCLH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LUVNCLH
YTD Return14.26%33.13%
1Y Return33.12%81.74%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.64%1.51%
5Y Return (Ann)-10.00%-12.88%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.87%-4.29%
Sharpe Ratio0.971.77
Sortino Ratio1.412.38
Omega Ratio1.201.33
Calmar Ratio0.591.16
Martin Ratio2.366.13
Ulcer Index15.49%14.71%
Daily Std Dev37.60%51.07%
Max Drawdown-78.23%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-47.36%-58.16%

Fundamentals


LUVNCLH
Market Cap$19.21B$12.25B
EPS-$0.08$1.14
PEG Ratio0.480.34
Total Revenue (TTM)$27.38B$9.36B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$1.70B$3.65B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.68B$649.79M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LUV and NCLH is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LUV vs. NCLH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than NCLH's 33.13% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has outperformed NCLH with an annualized return of -0.87%, while NCLH has yielded a comparatively lower -4.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.82%
69.40%
LUV
NCLH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUV vs. NCLH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUV, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUV, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LUV, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUV, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LUV, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.36
NCLH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NCLH, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.77
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NCLH, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NCLH, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NCLH, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NCLH, currently valued at 6.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.13

LUV vs. NCLH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the NCLH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUV and NCLH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.97
1.77
LUV
NCLH

Dividends

LUV vs. NCLH - Dividend Comparison

LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while NCLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
2.22%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.30%1.30%0.73%0.75%0.66%0.52%0.69%
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LUV vs. NCLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.23%, smaller than the maximum NCLH drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and NCLH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.36%
-58.16%
LUV
NCLH

Volatility

LUV vs. NCLH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) is 10.73%, while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that LUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.73%
11.97%
LUV
NCLH

Financials

LUV vs. NCLH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southwest Airlines Co. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items