LUV vs. NCLH
LUV (Southwest Airlines Co.) and NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. LUV operates in Airlines (Industrials), while NCLH operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LUV returned 3.84%/yr vs -6.60%/yr for NCLH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LUV vs. NCLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 20.59% return, which is significantly higher than NCLH's -8.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has outperformed NCLH with an annualized return of 3.84%, while NCLH has yielded a comparatively lower -6.60% annualized return.
LUV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 21.45%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 57.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.84%
NCLH
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 25.09%
- YTD
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -11.77%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 1.67%
- 5Y*
- -7.80%
- 10Y*
- -6.60%
LUV vs. NCLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUV Southwest Airlines Co. | 20.59% | 25.62% | 19.11% | -11.82% | -21.41% | -8.09% | -13.32% | 17.72% | -28.21% | 32.40% |
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | -8.65% | -13.25% | 28.39% | 63.73% | -40.98% | -18.44% | -56.46% | 37.79% | -20.39% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUV and NCLH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2013 | 0.52 |
The correlation between LUV and NCLH shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LUV:
$24.85B
NCLH:
$9.50B
LUV:
$1.56
NCLH:
$1.22
LUV:
31.61
NCLH:
16.73
LUV:
0.89
NCLH:
0.95
LUV:
3.62
NCLH:
3.91
LUV:
$28.88B
NCLH:
$10.03B
LUV:
$6.36B
NCLH:
$4.32B
LUV:
$2.74B
NCLH:
$2.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUV vs. NCLH — Risk / Return Rank
LUV
NCLH
LUV vs. NCLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUV | NCLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 0.21 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 0.44 | +3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUV vs. NCLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, smaller than the maximum NCLH drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and NCLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUV | NCLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.25% | -87.81% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.49% | -45.10% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.93% | -49.12% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.75% | -66.55% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.76% | -87.25% | +22.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.88% | -68.02% | +51.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -40.03% | +10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.88% | 21.75% | -4.87% |
Volatility
LUV vs. NCLH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) is 12.52%, while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that LUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUV | NCLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.52% | 14.28% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.29% | 43.13% | -7.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.25% | 53.26% | -8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 57.76% | -19.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 62.04% | -24.31% |
Dividends
LUV vs. NCLH - Dividend Comparison
LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while NCLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUV Southwest Airlines Co. | 1.46% | 1.74% | 2.14% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.30% | 1.30% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.66% |
NCLH Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LUV vs. NCLH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southwest Airlines Co. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUV vs. NCLH - Profitability Comparison
LUV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 7.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.
NCLH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 953.34M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.9%.
LUV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
NCLH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 232.94M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
LUV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a net income of 227.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
NCLH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 104.67M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUV and NCLH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCLH has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to LUV (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUV dropped -78.25% vs NCLH's -87.81%.
LUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUV and NCLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer