LUNAX vs. SPMAX
LUNAX (Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio) and SPMAX (Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LUNAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Saratoga, while SPMAX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, LUNAX returned 5.71%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for SPMAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LUNAX charges 0.99%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for SPMAX.
Performance
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNAX achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPMAX's 23.31% return.
LUNAX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMAX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 23.31%
- 6M
- 20.46%
- 1Y
- 37.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNAX Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 4.00% | 10.95% | 8.76% | 9.89% | -8.78% | 10.51% | 7.46% | 14.09% | -5.55% |
SPMAX Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio | 23.31% | 9.76% | 17.27% | 15.52% | -11.91% | 19.87% | 9.67% | 29.93% | -18.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNAX and SPMAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LUNAX and SPMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNAX vs. SPMAX — Risk / Return Rank
LUNAX
SPMAX
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNAX | SPMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 3.06 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 11.56 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNAX drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum SPMAX drawdown of -52.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNAX and SPMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNAX | SPMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.47% | -52.68% | +34.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.41% | -12.39% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.83% | -23.42% | +15.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -23.42% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -8.59% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 3.28% | -2.01% |
Volatility
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) is 2.77%, while Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that LUNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNAX | SPMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 8.11% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 16.45% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02% | 20.20% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 18.71% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 20.43% | -11.67% |
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LUNAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMAX's 2.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Dividend Comparison
LUNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, less than SPMAX's 26.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNAX Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 9.00% | 9.36% | 3.54% | 2.54% | 4.91% | 7.81% | 0.46% | 3.57% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMAX Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio | 26.67% | 32.89% | 18.90% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 16.31% | 9.56% | 0.01% | 13.58% | 8.25% | 8.08% | 5.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNAX and SPMAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMAX has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to LUNAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNAX dropped -18.47% vs SPMAX's -52.68%.
SPMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNAX and SPMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer