PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNAX vs. SPMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNAX achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPMAX's 23.31% return.


LUNAX

1D
0.78%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.00%
6M
3.45%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*

SPMAX

1D
2.04%
1M
7.89%
YTD
23.31%
6M
20.46%
1Y
37.42%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
4.00%10.95%8.76%9.89%-8.78%10.51%7.46%14.09%-5.55%
SPMAX
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio
23.31%9.76%17.27%15.52%-11.91%19.87%9.67%29.93%-18.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNAX and SPMAX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.87

The correlation between LUNAX and SPMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNAX vs. SPMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNAX
LUNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LUNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMAX
SPMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNAXSPMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.06

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

11.56

-2.48

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNAX and SPMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNAX drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum SPMAX drawdown of -52.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNAX and SPMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNAXSPMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-52.68%

+34.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-12.39%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.83%

-23.42%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-23.42%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-8.59%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

3.28%

-2.01%

Volatility

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) is 2.77%, while Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that LUNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNAXSPMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

8.11%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

16.45%

-10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

20.20%

-13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

18.71%

-11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

20.43%

-11.67%

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUNAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMAX's 2.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LUNAX vs. SPMAX - Dividend Comparison

LUNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, less than SPMAX's 26.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.00%9.36%3.54%2.54%4.91%7.81%0.46%3.57%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMAX
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio
26.67%32.89%18.90%1.28%2.11%16.31%9.56%0.01%13.58%8.25%8.08%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUNAX and SPMAX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMAX has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to LUNAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNAX dropped -18.47% vs SPMAX's -52.68%.

SPMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNAX and SPMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer