PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMAX vs. SMBPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SPMAX has outperformed SMBPX with an annualized return of 9.73%, while SMBPX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.15% annualized return.


SPMAX

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.94%
YTD
15.57%
6M
15.36%
1Y
30.81%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
9.73%

SMBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
-0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMAX
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio
15.57%9.76%17.27%15.52%-11.91%19.87%9.67%29.93%-16.98%12.86%
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.00%2.92%-0.11%1.84%-2.57%-1.39%0.77%1.00%-2.38%2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMAX and SMBPX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002

-0.04

The correlation between SPMAX and SMBPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMAX vs. SMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMAX
SPMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SPMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBPX
SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMAXSMBPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.91

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

5.57

-3.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.09

-0.81

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

6.52

-4.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.23

15.86

-6.64

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the SMBPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMAX and SMBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMAXSMBPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.91

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.08

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

-0.08

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.88

-0.46

Drawdowns

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMAX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, which is greater than SMBPX's maximum drawdown of -9.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMAX and SMBPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMAXSMBPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.68%

-9.99%

-42.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-0.69%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-4.48%

-18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-6.52%

-16.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.83%

-9.99%

-32.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-2.99%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-2.47%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

0.28%

+2.97%

Volatility

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SPMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMAXSMBPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

0.00%

+6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

0.39%

+14.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.06%

1.43%

+17.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

2.21%

+16.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

1.96%

+18.36%

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMAX has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMBPX's 3.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMAX vs. SMBPX - Dividend Comparison

SPMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.46%, more than SMBPX's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.69%2.69%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.10%0.10%0.36%0.23%4.23%1.50%
SPMAX
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio
28.46%32.89%18.90%1.28%2.11%16.31%9.56%0.01%13.58%8.25%8.08%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMAX and SMBPX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMAX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMAX dropped -52.68% vs SMBPX's -9.99%.

SMBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMAX and SMBPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer