PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNAX vs. SAMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNAX achieves a 4.00% return, which is significantly lower than SAMIX's 6.56% return.


LUNAX

1D
0.78%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.00%
6M
3.45%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*

SAMIX

1D
1.10%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6.56%
6M
5.60%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
4.00%10.95%8.76%9.89%-8.78%10.51%7.46%14.09%-5.55%
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
6.56%12.60%11.53%13.68%-10.56%14.08%9.36%17.88%-7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNAX and SAMIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.98

The correlation between LUNAX and SAMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNAX vs. SAMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNAX
LUNAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LUNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMIX
SAMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SAMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNAXSAMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.21

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

9.50

-0.42

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SAMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNAX and SAMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNAX drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum SAMIX drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNAX and SAMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNAXSAMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-26.06%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-7.29%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.83%

-12.90%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-15.54%

+3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.08%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-3.78%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.69%

-0.42%

Volatility

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) is 2.77%, while Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that LUNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNAXSAMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.98%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

8.13%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

10.03%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.55%

11.20%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

12.68%

-3.92%

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LUNAX and SAMIX have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

LUNAX vs. SAMIX - Dividend Comparison

LUNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, less than SAMIX's 9.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.00%9.36%3.54%2.54%4.91%7.81%0.46%3.57%2.14%
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.63%10.26%3.60%2.78%5.82%8.13%1.66%2.44%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LUNAX and SAMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SAMIX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to LUNAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNAX dropped -18.47% vs SAMIX's -26.06%.

LUNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNAX and SAMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer