SPMAX vs. SLCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) and Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX).
SPMAX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Jun 28, 2002. SLCGX is managed by Saratoga. It was launched on Sep 1, 1994.
Performance
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMAX Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio | -2.04% | 9.76% | 17.27% | 15.52% | -11.91% | 19.87% | 9.67% | 29.93% | -16.98% | 12.86% |
SLCGX Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio | -16.54% | 22.74% | 40.67% | 38.79% | -28.77% | 32.60% | 28.67% | 51.18% | -0.28% | 30.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMAX achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly higher than SLCGX's -16.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMAX has underperformed SLCGX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while SLCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.06% annualized return.
SPMAX
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -11.02%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
SLCGX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -16.54%
- 6M
- -14.88%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMAX has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SLCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPMAX vs. SLCGX — Risk / Return Rank
SPMAX
SLCGX
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) and Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMAX | SLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.54 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 0.92 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.53 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 1.83 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMAX | SLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.54 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.57 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.78 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMAX and SLCGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Dividend Comparison
SPMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.57%, more than SLCGX's 16.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMAX Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio | 33.57% | 32.89% | 18.90% | 1.28% | 2.11% | 16.31% | 9.56% | 0.01% | 13.58% | 8.25% | 8.08% | 5.04% |
SLCGX Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio | 16.57% | 13.83% | 23.77% | 7.53% | 7.55% | 23.16% | 8.91% | 31.50% | 25.22% | 5.81% | 23.83% | 10.21% |
Drawdowns
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMAX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, smaller than the maximum SLCGX drawdown of -71.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMAX and SLCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMAX | SLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.68% | -71.04% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -18.18% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -31.13% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.83% | -31.16% | -11.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -18.18% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -23.00% | +14.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 5.29% | -1.57% |
Volatility
SPMAX vs. SLCGX - Volatility Comparison
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio (SPMAX) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) at 5.31%. This indicates that SPMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPMAX | SLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 5.31% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 12.91% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 23.11% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 21.60% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 21.94% | -1.80% |