PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNAX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
-3.56%10.95%8.76%9.89%-8.78%10.51%7.46%14.09%-5.55%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-4.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNAX achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly lower than CONWX's 8.18% return.


LUNAX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*

CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.05%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LUNAX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUNAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LUNAX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNAX
LUNAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LUNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUNAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.70

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

2.36

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.99

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.48

11.30

-5.82

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNAX and CONWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.70

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.74

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.78

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between LUNAX and CONWX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

LUNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.71%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUNAX
Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.71%9.36%3.54%2.54%4.91%7.81%0.46%3.57%2.14%0.00%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%

Drawdowns

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNAX drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNAX and CONWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNAXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-26.09%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-8.60%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-12.49%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.41%

-2.03%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-2.78%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.52%

-0.21%

Volatility

LUNAX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (LUNAX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) at 2.12%. This indicates that LUNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LUNAXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.12%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.83%

5.43%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

10.70%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.41%

10.26%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

11.15%

-2.39%