LUN.TO vs. DASH
LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) and DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) are both stocks. LUN.TO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while DASH operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, LUN.TO returned 28.07%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for DASH. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUN.TO is traded in CAD, while DASH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DASH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 28.54% return, which is significantly higher than DASH's -32.09% return.
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 6M
- 39.35%
- 1Y
- 171.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.07%
- 10Y*
- 27.86%
DASH
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -32.79%
- 1Y
- -28.85%
- 3Y*
- 29.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 28.54% | 141.86% | 17.72% | 35.67% | -11.74% | -9.34% | 13.91% |
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -32.09% | 28.85% | 84.00% | 97.74% | -65.14% | 4.26% | -21.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUN.TO and DASH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
LUN.TO:
CA$32.59B
DASH:
$66.61B
LUN.TO:
$1.69
DASH:
$2.10
LUN.TO:
16.04
DASH:
71.77
LUN.TO:
0.10
DASH:
0.11
LUN.TO:
5.76
DASH:
4.51
LUN.TO:
3.40
DASH:
6.53
LUN.TO:
$4.04B
DASH:
$14.72B
LUN.TO:
$1.55B
DASH:
$7.49B
LUN.TO:
$1.92B
DASH:
$1.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUN.TO vs. DASH — Risk / Return Rank
LUN.TO
DASH
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and DoorDash, Inc. (DASH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUN.TO | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.91 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.12 | -0.60 | +5.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.75 | -1.02 | +17.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, which is greater than DASH's maximum drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and DASH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUN.TO | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -80.87% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.67% | -48.39% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.11% | -48.39% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -80.87% | +26.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -46.47% | +31.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.73% | -41.53% | -7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 28.30% | -18.02% |
Volatility
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.93% compared to DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) at 13.69%. This indicates that LUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DASH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUN.TO | DASH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.93% | 13.69% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.51% | 31.77% | +12.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.84% | 44.36% | +8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 54.28% | -8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.96% | 57.42% | -11.46% |
Dividends
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Dividend Comparison
LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while DASH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.29% | 0.68% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% |
Financials
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and DoorDash, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUN.TO vs. DASH - Profitability Comparison
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
DASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 4.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.
DASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported an operating income of 151.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
DASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a net income of 184.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUN.TO and DASH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUN.TO and DASH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer