CCL-B.TO vs. MFC
Compare and contrast key facts about CCL Industries Inc (CCL-B.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC).
Performance
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL-B.TO CCL Industries Inc | 1.53% | 19.18% | 26.04% | 4.84% | -13.35% | 18.83% | 6.04% | 11.82% | -13.08% | 10.92% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | -1.95% | 17.31% | 58.27% | 28.24% | 5.86% | 11.16% | -8.75% | 41.85% | -23.95% | 14.39% |
Different Trading Currencies
CCL-B.TO is traded in CAD, while MFC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MFC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CCL-B.TO:
CA$15.19B
MFC:
$42.78B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$4.58
MFC:
$3.73
CCL-B.TO:
19.12
MFC:
9.32
CCL-B.TO:
1.67
MFC:
3.17
CCL-B.TO:
2.00
MFC:
0.65
CCL-B.TO:
2.69
MFC:
0.99
CCL-B.TO:
CA$7.66B
MFC:
$83.02B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$2.30B
MFC:
$25.43B
CCL-B.TO:
CA$1.60B
MFC:
$7.53B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCL-B.TO achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CCL-B.TO has underperformed MFC with an annualized return of 7.36%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
CCL-B.TO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
MFC
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.75%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
CCL-B.TO
MFC
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCL Industries Inc (CCL-B.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCL-B.TO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.44 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 0.70 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 0.71 | +1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 1.96 | +4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCL-B.TO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.44 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.60 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCL-B.TO and MFC is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
CCL-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than MFC's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCL-B.TO CCL Industries Inc | 1.51% | 1.48% | 1.57% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.24% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.04% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.67% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.74% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
Drawdowns
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCL-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than MFC's maximum drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCL-B.TO and MFC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCL-B.TO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.52% | -83.61% | +22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -16.75% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.60% | -26.99% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.19% | -57.44% | +9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -8.88% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -29.59% | +13.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 5.37% | -0.99% |
Volatility
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
CCL Industries Inc (CCL-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) at 5.91%. This indicates that CCL-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCL-B.TO | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 5.91% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.74% | 13.76% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.14% | 24.36% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 21.45% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 26.00% | -0.31% |
Financials
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CCL Industries Inc and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCL-B.TO vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
CCL-B.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported a gross profit of 540.80M and revenue of 1.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.54B and revenue of 15.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CCL-B.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported an operating income of 262.40M and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.90B and revenue of 15.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
CCL-B.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CCL Industries Inc reported a net income of 171.10M and revenue of 1.88B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 15.54B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.