LULU vs. NBIS

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, LULU returned -49.22% vs 245.94% for NBIS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LULU vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -43.86% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 118.17% return.

LULU

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 4.38%
• 6M: -42.21%
• YTD: -43.86%
• 1Y: -49.22%
• 3Y*: -32.71%
• 5Y*: -21.18%
• 10Y*: 4.36%
• ALL TIME*: 12.49%

NBIS

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -36.30%
• 6M: 67.96%
• YTD: 118.17%
• 1Y: 245.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 264.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULU vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-43.86%	-45.66%	34.79%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	118.17%	202.18%	46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and NBIS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024	0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap LULU : $13.25B NBIS : $43.83B
EPS LULU : $12.35 NBIS : $3.08
PE Ratio LULU : 9.45 NBIS : 59.23
PEG Ratio LULU : 0.46 NBIS : 20.35
PS Ratio LULU : 1.23 NBIS : 56.43
PB Ratio LULU : 2.68 NBIS : 7.79
Total Revenue (TTM) LULU : $11.20B NBIS : $877.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) LULU : $6.24B NBIS : $420.60M
EBITDA (TTM) LULU : $2.44B NBIS : -$52.78M

Return for Risk

LULU vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 5
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 6
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 93
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULU vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LULU	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	2.32	-3.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	3.01	-4.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.34	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	5.45	-6.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.73	11.87	-13.60

LULU vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LULU vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and NBIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LULU	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.26%	-58.27%	-33.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.94%	-45.47%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.18%	-36.30%	-40.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-18.90%	-8.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.96%	20.83%	+9.13%

Volatility

LULU vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) is 11.62%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 32.60%. This indicates that LULU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LULU	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.62%	32.60%	-20.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.33%	75.89%	-43.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.01%	106.91%	-61.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.49%	110.41%	-67.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.77%	110.41%	-69.64%

Dividends

LULU vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LULU nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LULU and NBIS in my portfolio?

LULU and NBIS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LULU or NBIS?

NBIS has higher volatility (32.60%) compared to LULU (11.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.