LULG vs. SPUU
LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LULG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LULG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
LULG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -78.27% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.72% return.
LULG
- 1D
- -11.57%
- 1M
- -33.75%
- YTD
- -78.27%
- 6M
- -79.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 50.08%
- 3Y*
- 35.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 25.18%
LULG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -78.27% | 55.59% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 16.72% | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULG and SPUU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
LULG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
LULG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LULG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LULG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.88% | -59.35% | -20.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.88% | -3.83% | -76.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -9.48% | -26.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
LULG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.07% | 25.08% | +62.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.07% | 33.65% | +54.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.07% | 35.86% | +52.21% |
LULG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LULG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.37% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LULG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LULG.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for LULG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer