PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LULG vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LULG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -78.27% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.72% return.


LULG

1D
-11.57%
1M
-33.75%
YTD
-78.27%
6M
-79.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
16.72%
6M
15.35%
1Y
50.08%
3Y*
35.65%
5Y*
19.41%
10Y*
25.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LULG and SPUU is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LULG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LULGSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

LULG vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LULG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LULGSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.88%

-59.35%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.88%

-3.83%

-76.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-9.48%

-26.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

Volatility

LULG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LULGSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.07%

25.08%

+62.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.07%

33.65%

+54.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.07%

35.86%

+52.21%

LULG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LULG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LULG
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.37%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LULG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LULG.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 0.60% for SPUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LULG and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer