LULG vs. ROBN
LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) and ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LULG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for ROBN.
Performance
LULG vs. ROBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -73.29% return, which is significantly lower than ROBN's -60.68% return.
LULG
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -60.43%
- YTD
- -73.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ROBN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -43.72%
- 6M
- -47.77%
- YTD
- -60.68%
- 1Y
- -61.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $563.24K | $638.04K | $1.16M | |
| $16.27M | $25.25M | $33.44M |
LULG vs. ROBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -73.29% | 55.59% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -60.68% | -39.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULG and ROBN is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULG vs. ROBN — Risk / Return Rank
LULG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBN
LULG vs. ROBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LULG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LULG vs. ROBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, smaller than the maximum ROBN drawdown of -86.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and ROBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.88% | -86.84% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -86.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.26% | -81.64% | +6.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.46% | -46.37% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.67% | — |
Volatility
LULG vs. ROBN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULG | ROBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 108.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.71% | 141.03% | -55.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.71% | 150.78% | -65.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.71% | 150.78% | -65.07% |
LULG vs. ROBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBN's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LULG vs. ROBN - Dividend Comparison
LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 11.39% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LULG and ROBN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 11.39%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 1.05% for ROBN.
Find the right allocation for LULG and ROBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer