LULG vs. FNGG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) and FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LULG is actively managed, while FNGG is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LULG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FNGG.

Performance

LULG vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -78.27% return, which is significantly lower than FNGG's 11.08% return.

LULG

• 1D: -11.57%
• 1M: -33.75%
• YTD: -78.27%
• 6M: -79.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGG

• 1D: -5.43%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 50.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULG vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	-78.27%	55.59%
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	11.08%	-10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LULG and FNGG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

LULG vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNGG

FNGG Risk / Return Rank: 21
FNGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FNGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FNGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FNGG Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULG vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LULG	FNGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.29	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.80	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.07	—

Drawdowns

LULG vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, smaller than the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and FNGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LULG	FNGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.88%	-91.33%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-43.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.88%	-17.85%	-62.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.43%	-55.59%	+19.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LULG	FNGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.07%	43.47%	+44.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.07%	67.79%	+20.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.07%	67.79%	+20.28%

LULG vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

LULG vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison

LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares	10.67%	11.89%	0.79%	0.88%	0.00%	4.99%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LULG and FNGG in my portfolio?

LULG and FNGG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LULG or FNGG?

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LULG or FNGG?

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LULG or FNGG?

FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.67%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

What is the main difference between LULG and FNGG?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 0.97% for FNGG.