LUG.TO vs. POU.TO
LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) and POU.TO (Paramount Resources Ltd.) are both stocks. LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while POU.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO returned 32.69%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for POU.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -26.40% return, which is significantly lower than POU.TO's 23.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed POU.TO with an annualized return of 32.69%, while POU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.14% annualized return.
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -26.40%
- 6M
- -24.67%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 79.74%
- 5Y*
- 53.19%
- 10Y*
- 32.69%
POU.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- 23.00%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 37.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -26.40% | 291.22% | 91.60% | 29.55% | 30.60% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 66.93% | 10.15% | -13.88% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 23.00% | -21.48% | 30.17% | -4.83% | 21.05% | 396.81% | -33.69% | 5.01% | -63.03% | 22.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and POU.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.07 |
The correlation between LUG.TO and POU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LUG.TO:
CA$18.65B
POU.TO:
CA$4.35B
LUG.TO:
$3.77
POU.TO:
CA$0.37
LUG.TO:
14.57
POU.TO:
80.47
LUG.TO:
0.19
POU.TO:
0.80
LUG.TO:
6.66
POU.TO:
4.74
LUG.TO:
9.79
POU.TO:
1.58
LUG.TO:
$2.00B
POU.TO:
CA$902.30M
LUG.TO:
$1.41B
POU.TO:
CA$181.10M
LUG.TO:
$1.43B
POU.TO:
CA$329.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LUG.TO
POU.TO
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUG.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.27 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 5.78 | -4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, roughly equal to the maximum POU.TO drawdown of -98.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and POU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUG.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.74% | -98.31% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.89% | -18.11% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.89% | -53.34% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.89% | -56.46% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | -96.12% | +54.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.73% | -37.16% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -54.12% | -13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.24% | 7.11% | +7.13% |
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.86% compared to Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that LUG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUG.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.86% | 10.34% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.07% | 24.14% | +17.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.97% | 30.56% | +25.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.54% | 45.18% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 57.44% | -14.04% |
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than POU.TO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 6.79% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 2.04% | 2.89% | 5.34% | 5.78% | 3.95% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
Financials
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Paramount Resources Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUG.TO vs. POU.TO - Profitability Comparison
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
POU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 60.10M and revenue of 280.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
POU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of 40.10M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
POU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUG.TO and POU.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUG.TO and POU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer