LUG.TO vs. EGO
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LUG.TO or EGO.
Key characteristics
| LUG.TO | EGO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 88.39% | 18.43% |
| 1Y Return | 102.18% | 43.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 39.06% | 14.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 34.96% | 15.01% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 21.33% | -6.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.87 | 1.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.32 | 1.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.42 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.79 | 0.55 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.20 | 6.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.27% | 7.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.12% | 38.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -97.92% | -97.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.10% | -85.42% |
Fundamentals
| LUG.TO | EGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$7.40B | $3.19B |
| EPS | CA$1.76 | $1.39 |
| PE Ratio | 17.31 | 11.06 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$718.86M | $1.20B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$363.05M | $375.53M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$389.06M | $618.71M |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and EGO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a 88.39% return, which is significantly higher than EGO's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed EGO with an annualized return of 21.33%, while EGO has yielded a comparatively lower -6.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while EGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 2.23% | 3.27% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EGO Eldorado Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.05% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.30% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum EGO drawdown of -97.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and EGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 11.86%, while Eldorado Gold Corporation (EGO) has a volatility of 12.93%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LUG.TO vs. EGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Eldorado Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities