LUG.TO vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Performance
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -5.51% | 291.32% | 91.60% | 29.57% | 30.62% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 66.93% | 10.15% | -13.88% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 9.98% | 192.07% | 69.00% | 48.49% | -22.43% | -19.73% | 53.41% | 39.10% | -18.64% | 30.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while KGC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KGC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
LUG.TO:
CA$25.81B
KGC:
$36.89B
LUG.TO:
CA$3.28
KGC:
$1.97
LUG.TO:
32.41
KGC:
15.53
LUG.TO:
0.43
KGC:
0.21
LUG.TO:
14.40
KGC:
5.27
LUG.TO:
18.95
KGC:
4.31
LUG.TO:
CA$1.79B
KGC:
$7.06B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.26B
KGC:
$3.48B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.25B
KGC:
$4.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 38.67%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 26.46% annualized return.
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 7.21%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 151.69%
- 3Y*
- 96.76%
- 5Y*
- 64.31%
- 10Y*
- 38.67%
KGC
- 1D
- 6.59%
- 1M
- -15.76%
- YTD
- 9.98%
- 6M
- 23.02%
- 1Y
- 135.41%
- 3Y*
- 90.89%
- 5Y*
- 39.64%
- 10Y*
- 26.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUG.TO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
LUG.TO
KGC
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUG.TO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 2.80 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.87 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 4.67 | +1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.98 | 16.51 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUG.TO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.97 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.58 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and KGC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than KGC's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 4.69% | 3.37% | 2.69% | 3.28% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.44% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.45%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -91.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and KGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUG.TO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.45% | -96.00% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.33% | -30.20% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.94% | -61.44% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | -67.75% | +25.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.21% | -19.73% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.23% | -57.85% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 8.52% | +0.26% |
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.25% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 17.55%. This indicates that LUG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LUG.TO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.25% | 17.55% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.60% | 40.06% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.05% | 48.66% | +10.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.61% | 41.17% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.61% | 45.91% | -2.30% |
Financials
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUG.TO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 359.14M and revenue of 534.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 334.43M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.6%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 237.81M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in a net margin of 44.5%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.