POU.TO vs. GFR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) and Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR).

Performance

POU.TO vs. GFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) and Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

POU.TO vs. GFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd.	23.53%	48.84%	30.17%	-17.43%
GFR Greenfire Resources Ltd	34.57%	-35.67%	57.75%	-30.62%

Different Trading Currencies

POU.TO is traded in CAD, while GFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap POU.TO : CA$4.28B GFR : $500.85M
EPS POU.TO : CA$8.93 GFR : $0.64
PE Ratio POU.TO : 3.33 GFR : 9.94
PS Ratio POU.TO : 4.30 GFR : 0.79
PB Ratio POU.TO : 1.58 GFR : 0.43
Total Revenue (TTM) POU.TO : CA$998.20M GFR : $594.80M
Gross Profit (TTM) POU.TO : CA$291.70M GFR : $183.74M
EBITDA (TTM) POU.TO : CA$1.92B GFR : $176.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POU.TO achieves a 23.53% return, which is significantly lower than GFR's 34.57% return.

POU.TO

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 10.22%
• YTD: 23.53%
• 6M: 33.84%
• 1Y: 63.73%
• 3Y*: 29.60%
• 5Y*: 45.41%
• 10Y*: 27.69%

GFR

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: 8.50%
• YTD: 34.57%
• 6M: 36.67%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

POU.TO vs. GFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POU.TO

POU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
POU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
POU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
POU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
POU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
POU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

GFR

GFR Risk / Return Rank: 46
GFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GFR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GFR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POU.TO vs. GFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) and Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POU.TO	GFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	0.08	+1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	0.48	+1.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.06	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	0.31	+3.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	0.51	+7.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POU.TO vs. GFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the GFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POU.TO and GFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POU.TO	GFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	0.08	+1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	-0.04	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between POU.TO and GFR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

POU.TO vs. GFR - Dividend Comparison

POU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while GFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd.	2.02%	64.90%	5.34%	9.64%	3.95%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%
GFR Greenfire Resources Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

POU.TO vs. GFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than GFR's maximum drawdown of -50.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POU.TO and GFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	POU.TO	GFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.41%	-50.75%	-47.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.99%	-34.33%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-21.00%	+19.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.70%	-27.21%	-16.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	20.00%	-11.98%

Volatility

POU.TO vs. GFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) is 8.12%, while Greenfire Resources Ltd (GFR) has a volatility of 15.56%. This indicates that POU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POU.TO	GFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	15.56%	-7.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.61%	34.81%	-15.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.53%	51.21%	-18.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.41%	49.96%	-8.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.59%	49.96%	+6.63%

Financials

POU.TO vs. GFR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paramount Resources Ltd. and Greenfire Resources Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

POU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.20M and revenue of 259.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

GFR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.75M and revenue of 138.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

POU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of -10.10M and revenue of 259.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.9%.

GFR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported an operating income of 17.82M and revenue of 138.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

POU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of -1.90M and revenue of 259.90M, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.

GFR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Greenfire Resources Ltd reported a net income of -8.86M and revenue of 138.33M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.