LUBYX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LUBYX (Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - LUBYX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lord Abbett, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, LUBYX returned 3.41%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for VOO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LUBYX charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

LUBYX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUBYX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return.

LUBYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: 5.26%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUBYX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.34%	4.99%	5.70%	5.60%	-0.38%	0.07%	1.27%	3.00%	2.09%	0.73%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.19%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LUBYX and VOO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2016	0.05

The correlation between LUBYX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LUBYX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUBYX

LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUBYX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LUBYX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	1.91	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.00	2.60	+7.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.35	1.35	+2.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.85	2.67	+8.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.25	11.96	+38.29

LUBYX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUBYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUBYX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LUBYX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUBYX drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBYX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUBYX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-33.99%	+31.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.40%	-8.90%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.50%	-18.69%	+18.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.86%	-24.52%	+22.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-3.14%	+3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-3.68%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.09%	1.99%	-1.90%

Volatility

LUBYX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) is 0.42%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that LUBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUBYX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	4.83%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.96%	9.82%	-8.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38%	12.46%	-11.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.38%	16.91%	-15.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.12%	18.02%	-16.90%

LUBYX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUBYX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LUBYX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LUBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.41%	4.66%	4.72%	4.10%	1.33%	0.57%	1.16%	2.55%	2.27%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUBYX and VOO in my portfolio?

LUBYX and VOO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LUBYX or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to LUBYX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUBYX dropped -2.59% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.