LUBYX vs. CMNIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX).
LUBYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Oct 17, 2016. CMNIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on May 10, 2000.
Performance
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund | 0.40% | 4.99% | 5.70% | 5.16% | -0.38% | 0.07% | 1.27% | 3.00% | 2.09% | 0.73% |
CMNIX Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class | -0.07% | 6.89% | 7.43% | 9.17% | -4.26% | 5.02% | 5.36% | 6.72% | 1.79% | 4.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUBYX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than CMNIX's -0.07% return.
LUBYX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
CMNIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LUBYX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CMNIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LUBYX vs. CMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
LUBYX
CMNIX
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUBYX | CMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.09 | 1.64 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 10.34 | 2.45 | +7.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.37 | 1.52 | +1.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.49 | 2.02 | +9.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.88 | 13.84 | +33.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUBYX | CMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | 1.64 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.36 | 1.29 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.18 | 0.36 | +1.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between LUBYX and CMNIX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Dividend Comparison
LUBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than CMNIX's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund | 4.17% | 4.66% | 4.72% | 3.69% | 1.33% | 0.57% | 1.16% | 2.55% | 2.27% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMNIX Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class | 1.75% | 1.63% | 2.00% | 5.90% | 1.02% | 0.46% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 5.02% | 2.60% | 2.97% | 2.42% |
Drawdowns
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUBYX drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum CMNIX drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBYX and CMNIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUBYX | CMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -35.16% | +32.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | -2.71% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.86% | -7.52% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.02% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -7.20% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 0.40% | -0.30% |
Volatility
LUBYX vs. CMNIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) is 0.33%, while Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that LUBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LUBYX | CMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 0.77% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 1.33% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | 3.48% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.34% | 3.47% | -2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 3.63% | -2.52% |