LTTIX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

LTTIX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTTIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTIX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	4.54%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and FRQHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.90

The correlation between LTTIX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Volatility

LTTIX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LTTIX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTIX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, LTTIX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.