PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRIX vs. SRHQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRIX achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than SRHQX's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LTRIX has outperformed SRHQX with an annualized return of 11.04%, while SRHQX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


LTRIX

1D
1.10%
1M
1.67%
YTD
8.14%
6M
8.61%
1Y
20.37%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
11.04%

SRHQX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.14%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%21.38%
SRHQX
Principal Short-Term Income Fund
0.74%5.31%4.91%5.20%-4.19%-1.02%3.87%4.38%0.91%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRIX and SRHQX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

-0.06

The correlation between LTRIX and SRHQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRIX vs. SRHQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SRHQX
SRHQX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SRHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTRIXSRHQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.43

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.00

13.10

-2.11

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the SRHQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRIX and SRHQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRIX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, which is greater than SRHQX's maximum drawdown of -7.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRIX and SRHQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRIXSRHQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-7.95%

-43.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-1.06%

-6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-1.06%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-6.92%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-7.04%

-24.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.25%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-1.71%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.28%

+1.55%

Volatility

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) at 0.56%. This indicates that LTRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRHQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRIXSRHQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

0.56%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

1.27%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

1.76%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.68%

2.11%

+12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

1.85%

+13.01%

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTRIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHQX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTRIX vs. SRHQX - Dividend Comparison

LTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than SRHQX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.61%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%
SRHQX
Principal Short-Term Income Fund
3.75%3.66%3.51%2.38%1.38%1.33%2.17%2.05%2.07%1.71%1.65%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTRIX and SRHQX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTRIX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to SRHQX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRIX dropped -51.39% vs SRHQX's -7.95%.

SRHQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRIX and SRHQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer