SRHQX vs. PBCKX
SRHQX (Principal Short-Term Income Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both mutual funds - SRHQX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Principal, while PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, SRHQX returned 2.19%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for PBCKX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRHQX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.
Performance
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRHQX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -5.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SRHQX has underperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
SRHQX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
PBCKX
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -5.15%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- -1.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRHQX Principal Short-Term Income Fund | 0.74% | 5.31% | 4.91% | 5.20% | -4.19% | -1.02% | 3.87% | 4.38% | 0.91% | 1.81% |
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | -5.15% | 9.20% | 26.90% | 40.58% | -30.74% | 25.05% | 34.77% | 45.22% | 2.83% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRHQX and PBCKX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, SRHQX and PBCKX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRHQX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank
SRHQX
PBCKX
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRHQX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.01 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | -0.02 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.10 | -0.05 | +13.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRHQX drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum PBCKX drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHQX and PBCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRHQX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -38.00% | +30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.06% | -19.10% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -19.10% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.92% | -38.00% | +31.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.04% | -38.00% | +30.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -8.75% | +8.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -5.65% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 6.45% | -6.17% |
Volatility
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) is 0.56%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that SRHQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRHQX | PBCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 5.79% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.27% | 13.10% | -11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76% | 15.89% | -14.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.11% | 20.45% | -18.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.85% | 20.26% | -18.41% |
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRHQX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRHQX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison
SRHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than PBCKX's 21.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund | 21.03% | 19.94% | 9.01% | 0.51% | 0.71% | 6.67% | 3.28% | 8.90% | 7.86% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 2.40% |
SRHQX Principal Short-Term Income Fund | 3.75% | 3.66% | 3.51% | 2.38% | 1.38% | 1.33% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRHQX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBCKX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to SRHQX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRHQX dropped -7.95% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.
SRHQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRHQX and PBCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer