SRHQX vs. PCBIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SRHQX (Principal Short-Term Income Fund) and PCBIX (Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - SRHQX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Principal, while PCBIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, SRHQX returned 2.15%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for PCBIX. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SRHQX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for PCBIX.

Performance

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRHQX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than PCBIX's -3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SRHQX has underperformed PCBIX with an annualized return of 2.15%, while PCBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.

SRHQX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 0.50%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 1Y: 2.73%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: 2.17%
• 10Y*: 2.15%
• ALL TIME*: 1.62%

PCBIX

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: -3.13%
• YTD: -3.74%
• 1Y: -7.35%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 11.82%
• ALL TIME*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SRHQX Principal Short-Term Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SRHQX Principal Short-Term Income Fund	0.90%	5.31%	4.91%	5.20%	-4.19%	-1.02%	3.87%	4.38%	0.91%	1.81%
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class	-3.74%	1.62%	23.63%	25.92%	-23.16%	25.22%	18.25%	49.40%	-6.86%	25.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SRHQX and PCBIX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2001	-0.07

The correlation between SRHQX and PCBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SRHQX vs. PCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SRHQX

SRHQX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SRHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
SRHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SRHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SRHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SRHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PCBIX

PCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRHQX	PCBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	-0.61	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	-0.79	+4.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	0.91	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	-0.48	+3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.43	-0.94	+13.37

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRHQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the PCBIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRHQX and PCBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRHQX drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum PCBIX drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHQX and PCBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRHQX	PCBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-50.25%	+42.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.06%	-19.29%	+18.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.06%	-19.29%	+18.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.92%	-31.17%	+24.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.04%	-40.56%	+33.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-10.03%	+9.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-6.58%	+4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	9.82%	-9.54%

Volatility

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) is 0.37%, while Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that SRHQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRHQX	PCBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	5.19%	-4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.31%	12.00%	-10.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74%	15.15%	-13.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.12%	18.75%	-16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.85%	19.14%	-17.29%

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRHQX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PCBIX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRHQX vs. PCBIX - Dividend Comparison

SRHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than PCBIX's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class	6.04%	5.81%	6.40%	2.51%	3.18%	7.96%	1.08%	9.02%	12.24%	3.31%	2.49%	6.30%
SRHQX Principal Short-Term Income Fund	3.46%	3.66%	3.51%	2.38%	1.38%	1.33%	2.17%	2.05%	2.07%	1.71%	1.65%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRHQX and PCBIX in my portfolio?

SRHQX and PCBIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRHQX or PCBIX?

PCBIX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to SRHQX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRHQX dropped -7.95% vs PCBIX's -50.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRHQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.